Classical or Folk: Which is Better?

Last night, in a late-night discussion about the impact of music on body, mind, and soul, my brother and I argued the pros and cons of “classical” and “folk” music. Let me start with definitions:

“Classical” – instrumental music that utilizes stringed instruments or brass and sounds like it could have been written in the late 1700’s. (Bear with me. This is really quite a terrible definition. But it probably works just fine for the average person.)

“Fok” – any music written “of the people” or sounds like it was written by them or sounds like you can have a gay ole time partying to it.

So who won? It’s not that simple. At the end of the day, we both felt that lyrics are often integral to the communication of music. But nearly every great lyrical song also has some sort of a musical “set-up” section, where the song wouldn’t be the same without the bed of music upon which these words sit.

Conclusion: it might be worth one’s effort to try to write lyrics and a melody for Copland’s Appalachian Spring.

Instrumental Record?

I’ve been doing a lot of thinking lately. Always a bad sign. Why? Because it means that you’re not happy, I think. I have a lot of “unfinished” songs sitting in a drawer right now, and I was thinking about the best way to finish the songs. I listened to some of the sketch recordings I made and I came to a conclusion: one way to finish all of these songs is to keep them instrumental. They range the gamut, stylistically, and not all of them even need words to stand – the melodies and instrumentation can hold themselves up as is. So I just might do that. It would be yet another non-Jay Mathes “project” that I’m a part of, but it might be worthwhile, especially considering it might give me more material to pitch to advertisers, TV, movies, and video games. Just a thought. I’ll keep you posted.